Which statement is true about Australian normative data for the CBCL?

Which statement is true about Australian normative data for the CBCL?

• A. Australian norms are widely published
• B. Australian norms exist for some subscales
• C. There are no Australian norms, but it is still used extensively
• D. Australian norms are available only for the CBCL-YSR

Answer: (C)

Interpreting CBCL results depends on comparing a child’s scores to a reference group. In Australia, there aren’t dedicated, widely published Australian norms for the CBCL. Despite that, the measure is used extensively there because it has strong reliability and validity across diverse populations, and there are international norms (often US-based) that provide a meaningful reference point. Clinicians can still identify clinically significant problems and track change over time using those international norms, even without country-specific Australian data. The option about norms being available only for a related self-report measure isn’t correct, and the absence of Australian CBCL norms doesn’t undermine its widespread use in practice.

Interpreting CBCL results depends on comparing a child’s scores to a reference group. In Australia, there aren’t dedicated, widely published Australian norms for the CBCL. Despite that, the measure is used extensively there because it has strong reliability and validity across diverse populations, and there are international norms (often US-based) that provide a meaningful reference point. Clinicians can still identify clinically significant problems and track change over time using those international norms, even without country-specific Australian data. The option about norms being available only for a related self-report measure isn’t correct, and the absence of Australian CBCL norms doesn’t undermine its widespread use in practice.